Lower Athabasca Water Quality Monitoring Program PHASE 1 Athabasca River Mainstem and Major Tributaries 22 March 2011 Scientific Team: F. J. Wrona (eds), Environment Canada P. di Cenzo (eds), Environment Canada D. Baird, Environment Canada C. Banic, Environment Canada G. Bickerton, Environment Canada D. Burn, University of Waterloo P. Dillon, Trent Universit [...] S d. Future re rved Actual Effect Ch P e a s ng b e M O easured Status Quo Alternate Predicted Future Condition (Scenarios) Figure 4. A “world‐class” monitoring program measures how much environmental change has already occurred (Assessment of accumulated environmental state), as well as helps define what caused the change (Relationships between system drivers and environmental respo [...] DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT Cumulative Effects Monitoring then follows cumulative effects assessment and essentially determines if the observed future state followed the expected trajectory. This is a comparison of the expected (or predicted) to the actual response (Figure 4). 2.3 Triggers for Decision‐Making Adaptive program design ‐ alterations in spatial coverage and temporal [...] S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington DC 39 pp. Alberta Environment. 2006. Aquatic Ecosystems Field Sampling Protocols, March 2006. Edmonton, Alberta. Alberta Environment. 2007. Alberta Environment Data Quality Assurance Policy Procedures and Guidelines, July 30, 2004. Edmonton, Alberta. Alberta Environment. 2008. Muskeg River Interim Management Framework fo [...] Federal Oil Sands Advisory Panel Report 2010 ( ‐1) Fowlie, A.R., Hodson, P.V., Hickey, M.B.
- ISBN
- 9781100184715
- Published in
- Canada