At a meeting of the Technology Sub-Committee in May 2011, a broad range of issues were discussed in relation to this paper and it was resolved that the final deliverable should be to: •. Deliver an Information Management Policy framework for Canadian Courts to accommodate the risks, challenges and opportunities of a networked society and the increasing prevalence of court information in digitized [...] Electronic copies of the file or components within it may reside in multiple replicated locations within and external to the court and the notion of control over the file is much more difficult to translate into the digital domain due to this fragmentation, distribution and duplication of information. [...] Rivoalen J considered that his actions had caused potential harm to the child and held that the protection and welfare of a child superseded the interests of the media to obtain access to the courtroom. [...] On a motion by the crown, consented to by defence counsel, the trial judge ordered the exclusion of the public and the media from parts of the sentencing proceedings dealing with the specific acts committed by the accused, pursuant to s. 486(1) of the Criminal Code. [...] The trial judge stated that he made the exclusion order in the interests of the “proper administration of justice” to avoid “undue hardship on the persons involved, both the victims and the accused”.