The Guardian trashed the experts and the media rarely go beyond superficial 2011 Cannes meeting with the headline “G20 Summit: second-guessing and tedious complaints over lack of Slumping to the Occasion,” complaining the “G20 had accountability — to the detriment of sober discussion. [...] In a sense, the “EZ-17” have tainted the G20 with their The roLe of The G20 image of ineffectuality. [...] It rests on the dubious premise that a narrower focus would have produced greater progress on the core issues — that is, that the distraction of the working groups on The first thing to note is the contrast between the G20 development and anticorruption, for instance, have and traditional intergovernmental organizations. [...] Therefore the best way to judge the suitability of an issue for the G20 agenda is to estimate Given the G20’s main function of providing injections of the opportunity cost of senior officials’ involvement political impetus for policy problems, all agenda items in the issue — gauged realistically — compared to the should represent efforts to make advances that would not forward movement that would [...] The essence of the discipline is scale of these efforts — from macroeconomic rebalancing for proponents of an agenda item to specify the form of to, say, transparency of grain stocks — has made it harder progress that is sought as well as the prospects for the for the G20 to gain credit for the valuable role it can G20 to attain it.