cover image: A matter of choice

Premium

20.500.12592/pgjbms

A matter of choice

15 Dec 2011

This paper used a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to analyze the representation of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in the 2006 federal election in Canada. Using Fairclough's approach to CDA, the study analyzed written documents including newspaper articles from The Globe and Mail and The National Post, the policy platforms of the Liberal and Conservative parties, and political speeches from party leaders. The "choice" discourse was found to be dominant in the majority of texts examined. A dominant discourse is one that is created and sustained by those with power thus contributing to hegemony in society. Three textual and discourse processes were found to legitimize the "choice" discourse and contribute to its dominance: rationalization, nominalization and conversationalization. It is suggested that the language used in public documents throughout this election and the subsequent dominance of the "choice" discourse may have had a significant impact on citizens' understanding and appreciation of the complexities of ECEC in Canada.
health government education politics elections child care school taxation early childhood education media canada capitalism childcare conservatism culture government policy human capital election day care further education public funding discourse daycare child care services conservative party (uk) conservative party of canada paul martin sciences martin ideologies critical discourse analysis not-for-profits

Authors

Richardson, Brooke

ISBN
9781896051529
Pages
75
Published in
Canada

Related Topics

All