cover image: Is the Queensland Code for Biotechnology a good model for Canada?

Premium

20.500.12592/zkwx1q

Is the Queensland Code for Biotechnology a good model for Canada?

23 Dec 2004

Under the strengths and weaknesses discussion of this section, we show that the Queensland Code is highly detailed, is part of the development of a competitive industry strategy on the part of the Queensland Government and is applicable inside and outside government. [...] Under the guidance of the Office of Biotechnology and Science at Health Canada, the Institute On Governance contacted thirty-four people to ask them to take part in a telephone interview about the feasibility of developing a code for Canada and use of the Queensland Code as the model for such a code. [...] As part of the development of a Stewardship Framework, the government is considering the development of a code of practice for Biotechnology in Canada. [...] To investigate the possible development and implementation of such a code, the Office of Biotechnology and Science at Health Canada commissioned the Institute On Governance to conduct research that would provide the basis for a decision on whether to have a code and what model to use. [...] The Queensland Code – the model of choice – is summarized on Table 2. Having examined the rationale for a code of practice and the merits and drawbacks of three model codes, we conducted a preliminary preference analysis through a series of interviews to gather information about the views of a cross-section of stakeholders regarding a code.
health agriculture environment risk assessment politics governance science and technology research bioethics biology biotechnology ethics genetic engineering life sciences medicine philosophy risk cloning therapy gene therapy genetically modified biotech genetically modified food gene technology xenotransplantation

Authors

Fortier, Evlyn

Pages
50
Published in
Canada

Related Topics

All