Alternatives to Alcohol-Impaired Driving

The The profile of those respondents who indicated proportion of respondents who answered they always they used safe ride home programs in 2017 versus or almost always used these programs when available those who did not use these programs was further increased from 5% in 2015 to 8% in 2016 but slightly analyzed, and the results showed that the following decreased to 7.5% in 2017 (see Figure 4). [...] Figure 6: Percent who reported public transportation was / was not available in their area 5 ALTERNATIVES TO ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING IN THE U. S. | RESULTS FROM THE 2017 TIRF USA ROAD SAFETY MONITOR The majority of U. S. drivers reported not using public > Individuals living in rural or suburban areas were transportation when it is available as an alternative to much less likely to use public tra [...] In this regard, Figure 7 reveals those in urban areas (3% in rural areas, 8% in that in the three years a large majority stated that they suburban areas and 32% in urban areas). [...] Views and use of designated drivers injured in a collision in the past reported a greater that they had been a passenger of an alcohol-impaired likelihood of using public transportation in 2016, which driver in the past 30 days from 2015 to 2016. [...] Designated drivers Regarding the profile of users of designated drivers in 2017, the most notable difference with the other Drivers in the U. S. were polled about a third alternative alternatives was that females were more likely to solution involving the use of designated drivers.