NAFTA 2.0: For People or Polluters?

Written under the guidance of corporate solicit the guidance of frontline communities CEOs, NAFTA was never intended to prioritize from the Yukon to the Yucatan, and reject the workers’ rights, public health, or climate requests of corporate polluters for further justice—its goal was to boost the profits of handouts. [...] Currently, these exports are still a small percentage of the overall U. S. oil and gas “supply.” But if the percentage grows, the U. S. could find it increasingly problematic to be bound by the proportionality rule to continue oil and gas exports to Canada, even in the event of domestic shortages. [...] To meet the requirement for a Below, Graphs 5 and 6 show the difference in “proportional” export mix, the production types of oil produced in the proportionality- and export of tar sands oil, fracked gas, and free and proportionality-constrained scenarios, fracked oil would persist for decades, slowly while Graphs 7 and 8 show the same for gas and steadily falling in tandem with declining producti [...] The only stems both from the requirement to produce area where the proportionality-free scenario more oil and gas overall and to continue produces somewhat higher GHG emissions is producing the most polluting forms of oil in conventional oil and gas, since production and gas (tar sands oil and fracked oil and of these comparably less-polluting fuel gas) in order to satisfy stable export ratios. [...] Mexico’s First Biennial Update Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015 Natural Gas: A Detour in Mexico’s Energy Transition Under the past decade of NAFTA, Mexico’s imports of natural gas from the U. S. nearly oil exports to the U. S. have diminished, while quintupled,24 fueling increased fracking in the its imports of natural gas and petroleum U. S. Imports now ac